|
|
Monday, July 11

Untitled
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 08:54 AM EDT
GLENEAGLES, Scotland -- In a display of resolve following subway bombings in London, leaders of the major industrial nations pledged Friday to boost aid to Africa, help finance the Palestinian Authority, and bring China and India into what they called a "new dialogue" on global warming.
Meeting at a secluded Scottish golf resort, leaders from the Group of 8 wrapped up their closely watched summit slightly ahead of schedule so British Prime Minister Tony Blair could return to London to oversee his government's response to Thursday's attacks.
"We speak today in the shadow of terrorism," Blair said before leaving. "But it will not obscure what we came here to achieve. ... We offer today this contrast to the politics of terror."
As their nations' flags fluttered at half-staff outside, the G-8 leaders issued a series of communiques presenting what they described as a collective determination to tackle some of the world's most vexing challenges.
Yet on the two signature issues Blair had placed at the top of the summit agenda, Africa aid and climate change, the leaders avoided being tied down to the specific country-by-country targets sought by environmental and relief groups.
"It isn't all that everyone wanted," Blair acknowledged. "But it is progress; real, achievable progress."
President Bush left Gleneagles resort about an hour earlier than planned, without commenting publicly on the summit agreements, which some observers said had been watered down in response to U.S. pressure.
"There's been no movement from the Bush administration," said Jennifer Morgan, climate change director for the World Wildlife Fund. "Even the very noble efforts of Prime Minister Blair to get President Bush to change his position have failed."
For months, the summit had been a focal point for critics of globalization, advocates of Third World development and debt relief, and supporters of new efforts to address the environmental risks posed by global warming.
Millions of people tuned into worldwide broadcasts of last weekend's "Live 8" concerts organized by rock musicians Bob Geldof and Bono. Tens of thousands gathered in the Scottish capital, Edinburgh, to focus attention to the gathering at the Gleneagles resort 40 miles to the northwest. A few clashed with police, smashed car windows and disrupted traffic closer to the summit site.
But the sense of urgency escalated after the bombings, which some authorities believed were timed to coincide with the summit. The explosions forced G-8 leaders to revise their agenda so Blair could tend to the crisis.
The G-8 members represent the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Japan and Russia. Also attending the summit were the leaders of China, India, Mexico, Brazil and seven African nations, as well as U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and the heads of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
Most of the declarations endorsed by all G-8 members had been anticipated, and the final negotiations generally involved the nuances of multinational policy and the niceties of diplomatic language. Although the organization has no formal authority to legislate or enforce its decrees, its members generally feel bound by the commitments they make during summits.
Among the significant new initiatives announced was a pledge to provide $9 billion in aid over three years to the Palestinian Authority to help it establish a democratic government, provide security and rein in militants as part of an ongoing peace process with Israel.
(Begin optional trim)
Blair said the G-8 members agreed to provide the assistance Thursday evening, after the London attacks underscored the dangers posed by extremists. But U.S. officials said the initiative was added to the agenda last week in response to a proposal by former World Bank President James Wolfensohn.
U.S. Deputy national security adviser Faryar Shirzad, the only U.S. official to participate with Bush in all of the G-8 deliberations, said the funds would help the Palestinian Authority "spur the kind of economic development and governance necessary for them to develop a capability to govern."
(End optional trim)
The Africa aid pledge came after members met Friday morning with the leaders of seven African nations. The agreement calls on G-8 nations to double by 2010 their development assistance to the continent, which current stands at $25 billion a year. That increase was part of a broader commitment to boost development aid around the world by $50 billion a year.
The G-8 members also ratified an agreement by their finance ministers to write off about $40 billion in debt owed to multinational organizations by 18 poor countries, 14 of which are in sub-Saharan Africa. The deal will reduce annual debt service obligations by about $1 billion.
But Blair had to abandon his efforts to persuade the G-8 members to increase their overall development aid budgets to 0.7 percent of their nations' gross domestic product.
While Bush had promised to double U.S. aid to Africa to about $8 billion a year by 2010, it would require a far bigger increase to reach the 0.7 percent target. The total American aid budget amounts to less than 0.2 percent of gross domestic product, placing the United States 21st on a list of 22 industrial economies.
Blair's biggest disappointment might have been his inability to get Bush to consider entering into any kind of pact requiring specific reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases that contribute to global warming. The United States is the only G-8 nation that has refused to sign the 1997 Kyoto Protocol mandating such cuts.
Instead, Blair got an agreement acknowledging that human activity is a probable cause of global warming, and a commitment to launch multinational talks on climate change this year.
The so-called "action plan" was endorsed by the leaders of China, India, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, fast-growing economic powers who are becoming big consumers of oil and other pollution-producing fuels.

G-8 Leaders Agree on $50B in African Aid
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 08:48 AM EDT

Antigua marca de Cuba lleva a empresa al éxito
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 07:15 AM EDT

Una nueva guerrilla mexicana en Chiapas
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 07:10 AM EDT

Kurdish Suspects Reveal International Links, Officials Say
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 07:06 AM EDT

Mayor Pursues Plans Outside Manhattan, and Even Critics Applaud
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 07:03 AM EDT
Published: July 11, 2005
While public attention was focused on the city's ill-fated plan to build a stadium on the West Side of Manhattan over the past two years, the Bloomberg administration quietly labored over projects and development plans in corners of the city - from Jamaica, Queens, to Staten Island - that generated very few headlines.
Skip to next paragraph
Joyce Dopkeen/The New York Times
KeySpan Park in Coney Island, built by the Giuliani administration, has had little success in stimulating development in the neighborhood.
But the city has only so many resources, and not every project can get the full attention of City Hall. With the stadium plan now dead in Albany and the city's Olympic bid rejected, urban planners and local development officials are hoping that the Bloomberg administration will bring to other projects the same kind of energy and focus that it displayed on the West Side.
Even critics of the Bloomberg administration in private organizations, like Robert D. Yaro, the president of the Regional Plan Association, and Jonathan Bowles, the research director of the Center for an Urban Future, give Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg high marks for doing what few previous mayors have done: promoting economic development projects in the boroughs outside of Manhattan that could transform entire neighborhoods.
Those efforts include rezoning the crumbling industrial streets of Greenpoint and Williamsburg in Brooklyn in a plan for a waterfront residential neighborhood; reinvigorating the Hunts Point industrial park in the Bronx; and helping to create a relatively inexpensive office market in Long Island City, Queens.
But some officials active in development efforts in Jamaica and Long Island City say that while the Bloomberg administration did not ignore their communities, they wished that it had moved more swiftly.
"I give the administration enormous credit for its work in the boroughs," said Mr. Bowles of the Center for an Urban Future, a nonprofit research group. "But New York moves so slowly sometimes. It was the mayor's personal involvement on the West Side and Williamsburg that pushed them forward in an expedited manner. It'd be great if he could devote the same energy and resources to other projects."
Gayle Baron, president of the Long Island City Business Development Corporation, said there was increasing interest by Manhattan corporations in moving some of their operations to Long Island City. Citigroup is expected to start construction of its second office building there this fall.
The city, she said, is in final negotiations with a developer, Tishman Speyer Properties, over a proposed 2.2 million-square-foot commercial and retail project on a city-owned garage site at Queens Plaza, and Silvercup Studios plans a major building project in 2007.
But efforts have been "a little disjointed," Ms. Baron said, and she longs for something bigger.
"Where I think we really need help is with a comprehensive marketing initiative, with city funds, to really brand Long Island City," she said. "It's time for a comprehensive economic development plan that takes into account the commercial interests and the manufacturing and arts groups that continue to thrive in the area."
Mayor Bloomberg has dismissed criticism from his political rivals who say he has been "Manhattan-centric" and obsessed with stadium building, to the exclusion of projects in Queens, Brooklyn, the Bronx or Staten Island. In speeches before civic and business groups, he has challenged his critics to name another mayor who had invested $2 billion in projects in all five boroughs.
"The press has been focused on the West Side and the stadium, but my agency has been focused on all five boroughs for the last three and a half years," said Andrew M. Alper, president of the city's Economic Development Corporation.
"We've been working hard on the redevelopment of the Bronx Terminal Market, the homeport site in Staten Island, Downtown Brooklyn, the rezoning of Greenpoint-Williamsburg and the Potamkin project in Harlem," he said, referring to the Harlem Auto Mall, a joint venture of the Potamkin Auto Group and General Motors.
In the next few weeks, the Bloomberg administration expects to announce a major development project in Jamaica and the selection of a developer for the proposed East River Science Park, a corporate park for life science industries near Bellevue Hospital Center in Manhattan.

Bosnian Muslims Retrace Steps of Those Killed in 1995
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 07:00 AM EDT
Published: July 11, 2005
KONJEVIC POLJE, Bosnia and Herzegovina, July 10 -About 500 Bosnian Muslim men set out on foot at 7:30 a.m. Sunday from this quiet farming village in eastern Bosnia on the third and final day of their re-enactment of the "march of death" a decade ago this week.
Skip to next paragraph
Andrew Testa for The New York Times
A young Bosnian boy prayed over one of nearly 600 coffins stored at a battery factory for burial Monday, 10 years after the Srebrenica massacre.
Bearing Bosnian and Bosnian-Muslim flags, the men completed their solemn retracing of the route taken by an estimated 15,000 Muslim men during the war in Bosnia. They had fled the town of Srebrenica in panic in July 1995, after lightly armed United Nations peacekeepers failed to protect them from advancing Serb forces. The Serbs killed more than 7,000 of the fleeing Muslims in ambushes and mass executions that war crime judges later declared genocide.
On Sunday, the column of Muslims marching through the woods here were again surrounded by hundreds of armed Serbs, but on this day the Serbs were police officers assigned to protect the marchers.
Zoran Rosuljas, a Serb policeman who shook hands with one of the marchers along the route, said it was "no problem" guarding Muslims 10 years after the three-year war that killed more than 200,000 people. Asked if he felt comfortable with his former enemies, he swiftly responded. "Why not?" he said. "Why not?"
That handshake was just one of curious scenes on the final day of the 40-mile march to protest the failure to arrest the two Serbian leaders indicted on charges of genocide in the killings, Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic. As many as 50,000 people are expected to attend ceremonies on Monday marking the 10th anniversary of the fall of Srebrenica. The bodies of 610 men exhumed from mass graves and identified through DNA testing will be laid to rest.
As they began their final leg Sunday morning - actually a reverse tracing of the original march, to end in Srebrenica - the men first passed through the village of Nova Kasaba, the site of two mass graves dug by Serb soldiers. Beginning in 2001, Muslim families moved back into this area under the protection of American military forces that patrolled this part of Bosnia until 2004.
Mehmet Muharemovic, 50, a farmer in the village, said he had encountered no problems with local Serbs or Serb police. Asked about a chicken coop that had been built on top of one of the mass graves after it was exhumed, he said it belonged to another returning Muslim farmer. "It's no problem," he said, with a shrug, a cigarette dangling from his lips. "Everyone lost someone. What can you do about it?"
As the men made their way up dirt roads and mountain paths that, a decade ago, were filled with thousands of panicked Muslims, they spoke calmly. Ali Hodzic Naziv, the man who shook hands with the Serb policeman, said he was marching in memory of his two teenage sons, who disappeared somewhere in these forests.
Mr. Naziv, 53, a burly man who was evacuated from Srebrenica for medical treatment after he was shot in the left leg in 1993, was in pain after two days of walking. But he said it would make him feel better to see the route his sons, who stayed behind, took during their final hours.
"I have to hold on for my sons," he said as he struggled up a muddy path. "I will make it, if God lets me."
Amir Halicic, a wiry 20-year-old, said he was walking to understand what his father experienced when he successfully fled in 1995. He said his father told him he was too frightened to march, that he never wanted to walk through those forests again.
Mr. Halicic, 10 when Srebrenica fell, said he fled separately with his mother and grandfather. Two of them survived. "I didn't have a childhood," he said. "My grandfather was killed right in front of my eyes."
Near the front of the column was a tall, sunburned man who said he was returning to Srebrenica for the first time in 10 years. That man, Gary Kremer, had been a surgeon with the Dutch peacekeepers who were overwhelmed by Serb forces here in 1995. He said a Muslim he befriended during the war had invited him to march. Survivors from Srebrenica, who have bitterly complained that the Dutch did not do enough to protect them, seemed to treat him well.
Change was evident. When skull fragments were found at a spot where the column stopped to remember those killed in a large ambush, Muslim men came forward to photograph the remains with the cameras in their cellphones. Along most of the route, rebuilt homes and mosques, and newly planted fields, abound in what was a deserted no man's land of burned houses in 1995.
But the reality of what occurred here, and Bosnia's continuing struggles, sunk in as the march ended. The march stopped by a partially exhumed mass grave near Srebrenica. Staring down at exposed femurs, skulls and tibias, some of the exhausted marchers wept.

Jerusalem barrier: Security for Jews, hardships for Palestinians
by
salvador rosillo
on Mon 11 Jul 2005 06:54 AM EDT
|