
Which Mortgage Is Best?
In this downloadable audio guide Dennis Hevesi talks about how to find a mortgage in the New York region.
museum salvador rosillo
|
|
|||||
|
This Month
Month Archive
Login
|
Sunday, July 17
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 06:51 PM EDT
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 02:00 PM EDT
Which Mortgage? A Complicated Tale more »
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 01:52 PM EDT
HONOLULU, July 15 - Hawaii is once again awash with mainlanders, as summer vacationers delight in its beaches and make themselves feel at home even on distant tropical islands. Breakfast at Starbucks, lunch at Subway, dinner at Red Lobster and a restful night at the Marriott or Hilton. Skip to next paragraph
Andrew Shimabuku for The New York Times
Kekuni Blaisdell, who supports independence, says the bill "keeps us under the heel of the United States."
Andrew Shimabuku for The New York Times
Haunani Apoliona says the measure is a long overdue acknowledgment of the history of native Hawaiians. But most visitors soon discover something profoundly different about the 50th state that the requisite luaus and hula dances only hint at. The 250,000 indigenous people of Polynesian ancestry who are among Hawaii's 1.2 million residents make the state like no other, sustaining a native Hawaiian cultural and linguistic imprint that preceded the arrival of Capt. James Cook by a millennium. Now, 112 years after United States troops helped overthrow the independent Kingdom of Hawaii and 12 years after Congress apologized for it, that Hawaiian distinctiveness appears close to being formally recognized by the United States government. A bill that for the first time would extend sovereignty to the native Hawaiian people is poised for a vote - and likely approval - in the United States Senate despite opposition from many Republicans who denounce the measure as unworkable and as promoting racial Balkanization. The bill, the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act, is considered the most significant development for native Hawaiians since statehood in 1959. The measure would give them equivalent legal standing to American Indians and native Alaskans and lead to the creation of a governing body that would make decisions on behalf of the estimated 400,000 native Hawaiians in the United States. The governing body would also have the power to negotiate with federal and state authorities over the disposition of vast amounts of land and resources taken by the United States when the islands were annexed in 1898, including about 300 square miles of land long ago set aside for use as native homelands and an additional 2,500 square miles scattered throughout the islands being held in trusts. Haunani Apoliona, a musician who is chairwoman of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, a state agency that would be superseded by the new governing body, said the bill was a long overdue acknowledgment that Hawaiian history did not begin with the arrival of Cook and the British Navy in 1778. "We were here before Columbus," Ms. Apoliona said. "We were in Hawaii before the Pilgrims." The House of Representatives has passed earlier versions of the bill and would take up the current one if the Senate passes it, perhaps as early as next week. The Bush administration has remained largely neutral on the measure, though the Justice Department on Wednesday cast some doubt on the constitutionality of the proposed law, namely whether Congress has the authority to treat native Hawaiians as it does Indian tribes. Assistant Attorney General William E. Moschella said in a letter to Congress that the proposed law also must be amended to include protections for United States military operations in Hawaii and stronger language precluding casino gambling. The bill's supporters in Hawaii say that they do not intend to have casinos and that the Justice Department's other concerns can be addressed. But they acknowledge there are basic questions that will take years of negotiations to answer, like how native Hawaiians would go about governing themselves, whether native Hawaiians in and outside the state would live under different laws from other citizens, and who would qualify as a native, given the large degree of assimilation through marriage and the many Hawaiians living on the mainland. As for the measure's constitutionality, most everyone believes that will ultimately be determined by the United States Supreme Court. The measure, which took more than five years to reach the Senate floor, arises from conflicting crosscurrents in Hawaiian society, as native Hawaiians grow impatient for the United States to right the wrongs of more than a century ago, while many nonnative residents and interest groups seek to scale back entitlement programs already available to native Hawaiians.
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 12:54 PM EDT
With his poll numbers plunging, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is betting his future - and California's - on a special election in November. Dick Morris writes in an exclusive special report for NewsMax Magazine that "Arnold's Bold Gamble" may re-shape American politics forever. The "Arnold's Bold Gamble" edition of NewsMax Magazine is just hitting newsstands across the country (including many Barnes & Noble and Books-a-Million bookstores). You can also check out our FREE offer by Going Here. In this blockbuster report, Dick Morris reveals:
This explosive edition of NewsMax Magazine details what Dick Morris calls Schwarzenegger's "One-Man Revolution" - and tells why Arnold's vision should be a blueprint for all chief executives to follow. Schwarzenegger openly says he'd like to president. The Constitution still bars him from doing so, but Dick Morris reveals that Schwarzenegger's ballot plans may electrify America.
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 06:12 AM EDT
Joel Saget/Agence France-Presse - Getty Images
AX-3 DOMAINES, France, July 16 - A surging Lance Armstrong faced his most direct challenge in this year's Tour de France on Saturday, the first of three days in the Pyrenees, only to widen his lead by more than a minute over his closest rival. Skip to next paragraph
![]() Tour Interactive Follow the race with live updates, maps and stage-by-stage results. Armstrong, isolated from his team by the German T-Mobile team's attack, did everything but win the stage, the 14th of 21. He took second in the stage from Agde to Ax-3 Domaines, finishing the 220.5 kilometers (137 miles) 56 seconds behind Georg Totschnig of Austria. Totschnig, who rides for the Gerolsteiner team, was ahead for most of the day after the early breakaway. He was timed in 5 hours 43 minutes 43 seconds, a dazzling speed of 23.9 miles an hour, considering the climbs and the heat. The temperature reached 108 degrees. "A very tough day with the heat and the distance," said Armstrong, who is seeking his seventh straight Tour de France victory. "A very tough day." It was an even tougher day for Mickael Rasmussen of Denmark, the rider in second place over all. Rasmussen, with the Rabobank team, finished eighth Saturday, 51 seconds behind Armstrong. He remains second to Armstrong over all, but he dropped to 1 minute 41 seconds back. The stage began in the Mediterranean port of Agde and passed over four minor climbs until the 176th kilometer (about 109 miles), when the riders began ascending the Port de Pailhères, a climb of 15.2 kilometers (about 9.5 miles) at a grade of 8 percent. Armstrong had no teammates to help him up the climb because, as he put it, T-Mobile sprinted at the start of it, and Armstrong's Discovery Channel teammates, wearied by the heat and their work at the front of the pack, were left behind. "Naturally that gives you fear," Armstrong said of T-Mobile's tactics. "You either fight back or run away." He fought back, of course. After the descent from the peak, the stage ended with a climb to the resort of Ax-3 Domaines, an ascent of 9.1 kilometers (about 5.7 miles) with a grade of 7.3 percent. On both mountains, Armstrong responded powerfully to attacks by Ivan Basso of Italy, with CSC, and Alexander Vinokourov of Kazakhstan, with T-Mobile. Armstrong, Basso and Jan Ullrich of Germany, with T-Mobile, were together with a few kilometers to go, when Armstrong accelerated, leaving Ullrich behind. Then Armstrong sprinted for second place and 12 bonus seconds for finishing second. "When you can steal 15, 20 seconds, you have to do it," he said. "You have to be opportunistic." Basso received an eight-second bonus for finishing third. Because Totschnig was no threat in the overall standings, he was allowed to go off early in the day with a half-dozen similarly low-ranked colleagues. As they were reeled in one by one on the two major climbs, Totschnig managed to maintain his lead, which reached a maximum of 9:50 before it shrunk to 56 seconds. As the first Austrian to win a stage in the Tour since Max Bulla in 1931, he was asked if this was the happiest day of his life. No, he touchingly replied, that would have been the days his son and daughter, Max and Emma, were born. Discussing Sunday's stage, which should be even tougher, Armstrong said he would change his tactics. "I won't be making any explosive moves tomorrow," he said at a news conference. "I have to wait for the final climb." Sunday's stage, 205 kilometers (127.4 miles) from Lézat-sur-Lèze to Saint-Lary Soulan, will cover six mountaintops. Portet d'Aspet, the first climb, is considered a second-category climb in terms of length, steepness and difficulty. The peaks that follow, Menté, Portillon, Peyresourde and Val Louron-Azet, are all ranked first category. The stage ends with a climb to Pla d'Adet, which is above the town of Saint-Lary Soulan. Pla d'Adet is the backbreaker, especially after the first five. It is a climb of 10.7 kilometers (6.6 miles) at a grade of 7.6 percent. It is beyond a category rating. "Tomorrow's no cakewalk," Armstrong said. "It's the queen stage, the hardest day in the Tour." Christophe Moreau, a Frenchman with Crédit Agricole, also lost time to Armstrong on Saturday. He started the day in third place over all, but he fell to 10th after finishing 24th. He was 6:47 behind Totschnig and dropped to 8:37 back over all. Basso is now in third over all, 2:46 behind. His third-place finish Saturday, two seconds behind Armstrong, moved him up one place over all. Ullrich finished fourth in the stage and moved into fourth over all (4:34 behind Armstrong), up from eighth. Two Americans, Levi Leipheimer of Gerolsteiner and Floyd Landis of Phonak, are fifth (4:45 back) and sixth (5:03 behind). In discussing Basso, who finished third in the Tour last year, and Ullrich, who has been second five times and won in 1997, Armstrong said, "Both were stronger than we saw in the Alps." He added that he expected them to do well Sunday, but that the heat might take its toll. "If it's this hot again tomorrow," Armstrong said, "a lot of riders will be going home." Although all 160 riders who started the stage Saturday finished it, 112 of them finished more than 20 minutes behind the winner. After a day off Monday, the festivities in the Pyrenees end Tuesday with two small climbs and the first-category Marie Blanque and the beyond-category Aubisque. This was Armstrong's third second-place finish in this Tour, and he has yet to win a stage. "It's not important, but I can't seem to win one," Armstrong said. "I'd like to win one. Maybe I'll win tomorrow."
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 06:10 AM EDT
PARKER, Colo., July 12 - Tom Woods, a 37-year-old defense industry consultant, wanted to build a nest egg for one of his young sons' college tuition. Inspired by rising prices for homes in this Denver suburb, three years ago he invested in a new three-bedroom townhouse for $155,000. His hopes were that renters would cover most of his mortgage and that the property's value would appreciate by at least $10,000 a year. Skip to next paragraph
Kevin Moloney for The New York Times
To entice homebuyers, sellers are reducing prices in Denver as the once-hot housing market there slumps. But last October, when Mr. Woods put the townhouse up for sale to help pay some unforeseen medical bills, there was more pain than gain: the house sat on the market for eight months. He finally found a buyer in June, but to seal the deal he had to make big concessions, including paying the buyer's closing costs. After handing over the keys on Friday, he ended up with a profit of just $10,000 for his three-year investment. Even as prices for homes in frothy markets like Las Vegas; Riverside, Calif.; Miami; and Washington are still jumping by more than 20 percent a year, Denver's homeowners are learning the hard way about living through the real estate doldrums. Five years ago, median house prices were rising at an annual clip of nearly 17 percent. By the first quarter of 2005 the increase had slipped to 3 percent, according to an analysis by Economy.com, a research firm. Still, some Denver homeowners have read reports in the news media of skyrocketing prices elsewhere and assume they are accumulating wealth in their homes at the same rapid pace. "I was surprised," Mr. Woods said. "My expectations were higher." Although sellers continue to profit, houses are sitting on the market longer, buyers are negotiating harder, and some owners, particularly young buyers who may have been counting on rapid appreciation, are postponing dreams of renovations, moves to larger homes and big savings for their families. With economists warning that prices in hot markets cannot continue to rise as sharply as they have in the past few years, the experience of Denver's homeowners may foreshadow what could happen if those markets start to cool. Denver's circumstances are in some ways particular to the area, driven largely by job losses in the telecom sector, but they illustrate how a moderate slowdown could play out for homeowners in other parts of the country and stand as a potent reminder that galloping price appreciation is not the norm. Economists are divided as to whether certain markets will simply cool off, or whether they will actually melt and send prices plummeting, as happened in parts of California, New England and New York in the 1980's and early 1990's. Earlier this year, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said some metro areas were showing signs of "froth." Optimists point to Denver as a model of an adjusting real estate market. "I think it's a good example of when a market softens, what happens," said David Lereah, the chief economist of the National Association of Realtors, a trade association. "You see double-digit price appreciation go down to 4 percent or even 1 percent, and then it starts coming back to a historical norm of between 4 and 6 percent. That's very healthy. That's wonderful. It beats inflation." But many analysts take a gloomier perspective, suggesting that the most heated markets could suffer more than Denver's so-called soft landing. "I think Denver is a best-case scenario," said John H. Vogel Jr., adjunct professor of real estate at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. In the case of markets like Naples, Fla.; Miami; and New York, he said, "I think you'll see dramatic price decreases because I think the prices have become artificially inflated by trading and speculation." Denver's housing boom never quite reached the heights of Las Vegas's, for example, where home prices increased by nearly 33 percent in the first quarter of this year, according to Economy.com. But from 1998 through the third quarter of 2001, homeowners in sprawling Denver enjoyed double-digit appreciation as telecom employers like Qwest Communications International added jobs - and homebuyers - to the market. From December 2000 to September 2003, however, Denver lost about 74,000 jobs, about 6 percent of its job base, according to Economy.com. Increases in home prices stalled, then started to taper off. Houses lingered on the market, and sellers were forced to cut prices. Touring a development last week in Castle Rock, a southeastern suburb, Tom Santilli, an agent with Re/Max Alliance, pointed out a four-bedroom house that had not sold for five months, despite its impeccable condition. The price had been lowered to $396,500 from $419,000, but because of a few flaws - a smallish family room, and white kitchen cabinets instead of wood and glass - the sellers had "not even had a low-ball offer" after showing it to 65 prospective buyers, Mr. Santilli said.
by
salvador rosillo
on Sun 17 Jul 2005 06:09 AM EDT
WASHINGTON — The young man was poor and without prospects, but that was not why he carried the bomb. He had not been recruited and was not out for revenge, he said, but simply longed to fulfill "the love of martyrdom." As he lugged his heavy black bag toward an Israeli bus stop, his main worry was not moral but practical. The bomb, evidently derived from fertilizer, smelled terrible, and might give him away. He bought a $3 bottle of perfume and doused it. Skip to next paragraph
RELATED Easing Anxiety on Mass Transit (July 17, 2005) He was a figure out of a nightmare scenario of cultish, facile killing and self-destruction. But he was real enough, a Palestinian named Zaydan Zaydan, 18. He was interviewed in an Israeli hospital three years ago after the bomb went off, wounding only him. The nightmare assumed a new form last week when British authorities revealed that four British men were suspected of detonating the explosions that killed at least 54 people and injured hundreds in downtown London on July 7. Framed by new suicide attacks in Israel and Iraq, the news suggested the European breakout of suicide violence that many had feared since the Sept. 11 attacks. The British authorities were initially careful not to call the men suicide bombers, though they said all four died in the bombings. If the attacks were Islamist suicide bombings, they were the first such strikes in Western Europe, terrorism experts said. This was once a freakish phenomenon, and then a more frequent but concentrated one, confined to battlegrounds like Lebanon and Chechnya. But a "love of martyrdom," with its paired desire to kill indiscriminately, may now have taken hold in Leeds, England, just as it did for Zaydan Zaydan in his hometown, Jenin, on the West Bank. With the successful deployment of a human delivery system, terrorists in Europe appeared to have at hand the same arsenal - hardware-store ingredients, some secrecy and cunning, and a lethal ideology - that they have used to torment Middle Eastern societies. Yet while there was new cause for fear, there was also reason for hope. Experts on terrorism said the danger of suicide attack was rising, but that outside of areas embroiled in conflict it was still partly contained by a firewall of social condemnation. "One should not draw too many parallels between what is happening in the Middle East and what is happening elsewhere," said Efraim Halevy, a former chief of Mossad, Israel's spy agency. "It's not the same balance of power within the community," he said. "That's No. 1. That's very important." Still, Mr. Halevy added, while the parallels might be limited, some did exist. "The threat is such that a very small number of people can bring about an act of such devastating consequences," he said. Several experts on terrorism said they would not be surprised if suicide had indeed emerged as a weapon in the hands of native Muslim terrorists in Western Europe. "What I'm most surprised about is that it hasn't happened before now," said Lance Emory, who served with the F.B.I. in Britain from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Emory said the British had "done a pretty good job" and had "had successes" disrupting attacks in the past. But suicide bombing is "just the most difficult thing to try to ferret out," he said, "because you've got someone who's totally committed." Several terrorism experts said that with extremist preaching preparing the way, little sophisticated infrastructure is needed to conduct bombings like those in London. "I don't think it needs a recruiting system at all," Mr. Halevy said. "All it needs is that there should be in place a very small capacity which would enable young people who wish to follow this path to find their way to Afghanistan and Pakistan, to get training." He added, "The masterminds, they're not looking for multitudes of people." Out of 1.6 million Muslims in Britain, he said, there was bound to be "a small nucleus of people who were extreme." Fighting in Iraq and the West Bank and Gaza appears to be further fanning the desire - or supplying the rationale - for violence, increasing estrangement from the surrounding non-Muslim community. Some terrorist experts also warned that European jihadists who went to fight in Iraq or Afghanistan were returning with new skills. |
||||